Nathan B. Harvey ca. 1880 |
Lori writes: "My family has lived near this area for 5 generations and I'm curious if anyone knows if the old large green farm house on the North side of Johnson Creek Blvd as it goes up the hill west toward the rail tracks, was owned by the Harvey family? My grandfather at 15, around 1918, was pulled from that house in the middle of the night by his father after his mother read of a murderer owning the house. My grandfather had been working in the fields of the owner and sleeping over at the house with some other boys at night. My great grandmother said something about the murder of a young girl being found in the fields and the perpetrator owning this home. I still drive by this house often, tempted to ask the new owners but I hesitant to freak anyone out."
Lori – First of all, thanks for the comment! Secondly, please don’t knock on anyone’s doors and ask them about axe murders. I’m uncertain about the house you are referring to, but it definitely never belonged to Nathan B. Harvey. Harvey purchased the land he lived on, about a mile south of the 32nd Ave. bridge over Johnson Creek, in 1882 and, after 1900, he never lived anyplace else. I don’t know who might have been living there in 1918. I had started a short response to you but found it needed more exposition so here I go.
The
crime to which Lori is referring was incorrectly reported in the 1911-1912 newspapers
to have been committed in one of Nathan Harvey's fields. The girl's name was
Mamie Walsh and she was murdered by a man named Charles Wilson in 1892. Mamie
was living with her family on the Seth Lewelling farm,
which ran along the east bank of the Willamette from where Johnson Creek
empties into the river. The orchards, which were said to have over 1000 trees, are
the current site of Waverly Heights neighborhood, and the Waverly Hills Country
Club. There’s a gas station where the Lewelling house use to stand and I don't
believe any structures from 1892 still exist in the area as most of those
houses date back no later than the 1930s. Mamie was found under some brush on
the other side of the road from one of the Lewelling fields. The place where
the crime occurred, and the body was found, was almost a mile away from Nathan
Harvey’s nursery, and separated by the Scott Woods. I believe Scott Park, in north
Milwaukie, is the last remnant of these woods. The murderer, Wilson, had
confessed to the murder, escaped while being transferred, was recaptured, and later
hanged himself in his jail cell. The case was closed, and no one doubted it for
a moment.Sheriff Ernest T. Mass
So, Lori, if you want to scare people about nearby murders,
might I suggest the 5th green at Waverly Hills Country Club. I have
no reason to believe this is the spot Mamie Walsh was murdered, but you’d be
closer here than at the house on the hill.
I want to get more into Nathan Harvey, and, thanks to
Lori’s comment, I’ve cracked open some old research so maybe I’ll get into it.
Right now, reader comments will pretty much drive this blog as there’s hasn’t
been much new to discover, so keep those comments coming.
1 comment:
Thanks, Inspector. Another really interesting post, as always. Far be it from me to make suggestions for your already brilliant blog, but I just wanted to pick up on your comment about there (at present) being little more new information to uncover.
Something I'd be very interested to read is your summary of exactly what we know and can reasonably surmise about the unsub by drawing together all of the information you've so diligently compiled so far. I'm not suggesting a full-blown psychological profile, necessarily, but I do feel that there are details that are so common between the cases as to strongly imply certain characteristics (for example, does the overkill exhibited towards the 'strongest' member of each household, coupled with his unwillingness to confront conscious victims - fleeing after awaking the mother and daughter in Paola - suggest that he was not of imposing physical stature? Does the persistent window-peeking connection suggest prior voyeuristic behaviours which were no longer satisfying him and escalated to a need to control the subjects of his voyeurism? Can we draw any theoretical conclusions from his ancillary actions at the crime-scenes?). I'd really appreciate a summary of what you believe in general about the unsub.
Another point that's been nagging at me is regarding the geographic profiling of what we might call the 'Midwest portion' of the crimes. I may be wrong, but I believe I see here a telling pattern. Let's say, for argument's sake, that our unsub was based in Kansas City at the time of these murders (a not unreasonable assumption, I feel, as it was a major rail hub and population centre for the region). This is largely supposition, but I hope you'll humour me. As many inexperienced murderers do, he committed his first murder a long way from home, roughly 600 miles to the west in Colorado Springs. When he is not apprehended for this crime, he gains some confidence, but may have felt that the heat was still on to the west, so his next crime was a little closer to home, but in the opposite direction - 300 miles to the east this time in Monmouth. Next, following this same principle, he reverts back to the west, but he's grown in confidence yet again that he won't be caught, so this time it's only about 200 miles to Ellsworth. His next crime is only 100 miles from 'home', now south. What I believe to be the final crime, at Villisca, is slightly further away again (but only slightly), and this time it's due north. If you plot this phase of the murders on a map, they visibly gather inwards towards Kansas City, crisscrossing back and forth across it each time. I hope my ramblings make sense. I realise this might not help with pinpointing a specific suspect, but I do believe the Kansas City connection is worth mentioning (and perhaps warrants further exploration).
Thanks again for your excellent blog. I genuinely always look forward to what's coming next.
Post a Comment